[1]姜黎明,贺飞,卢春利,等.基于电阻率渐变侵入地层模型的阵列侧向测井反演研究[J].测井技术,2019,43(03):247-251.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.005]
 JIANG Liming,HE Fei,LU Chunli,et al.Array Lateral Logging Inversion Based on Resistivity Gradient Intrusion Formation Model[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2019,43(03):247-251.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.005]
点击复制

基于电阻率渐变侵入地层模型的阵列侧向测井反演研究()
分享到:

《测井技术》[ISSN:1004-1338/CN:61-1223/TE]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
247-251
栏目:
方法研究
出版日期:
2019-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Array Lateral Logging Inversion Based on Resistivity Gradient Intrusion Formation Model
文章编号:
1004-1338(2019)03-0247-05
作者:
姜黎明12 贺飞12 卢春利12 曹景致1 郭英才1 张培军1
(1.中国石油集团测井有限公司技术中心, 陕西 西安 710077; 2.中国石油天然气集团测井重点实验室, 陕西 西安 710077)
Author(s):
JIANG Liming12 HE Fei12 LU Chunli12 CAO Jingzhi1 GUO Yingcai1 ZHANG Peijun1
(1. Technology Center, CNPC Logging CO. LTD., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710077, China; 2. Well Logging Key Laboratory, CNPC Logging CO. LTD., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710077, China)
关键词:
阵列侧向测井 Logistic函数 渐变侵入地层模型 电阻率连续反演
Keywords:
array lateral logging logistic function gradient intrusion formation model continuous inversion
分类号:
P631.84
DOI:
10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
利用视电阻率求取含油气饱和度误差大。解决视电阻率与真实电阻率差异问题,一般通过校正图版和电阻率反演这2种方案。校正图版均为理想模型所建立,最大问题是单因素叠加校正,造成误差很大,反演算法综合考虑了井眼、地层侵入带、围岩等因素,比图版法更合理。但目前基于阵列侧向测井资料所用的三参数或五参数反演,构建的正演侵入地层模型为井眼、侵入带、原状地层,电阻率变化为台阶状变化,这与实际地层侵入特征不符。提出基于改进的三参数Logistic函数的电阻率渐变侵入地层建模方法,采用并行差分进化算法实现了沿地层径向的电阻率连续反演。利用三层正演模型对算法进行了验证,无论是高侵模型还是低侵模型,反演电阻率接近真实值,误差在1%以内。
Abstract:
Due to factors such as wellbore, drilling mud intrusion and surrounding rock, the resistivity(apparent resistivity)from electrical logging data is very different from true formation resistivity, so that a large error occurs to the oil saturation calculated using apparent resistivity. Generally correction charts and resistivity inversion models are used to eliminate the difference. A correction chart is established by an ideal model. The biggest problem is single factor superposition, so it may cause a large error. An inversion model takes such factors into account as wellbore, intruded zone and surrounding rock, so it is more reasonable than a correction chart. The forward intrusion model based on three-parameter or five-parameter inversion using array lateral logging data considers wellbore, intruded zone and undisturbed formation, so that the resistivity changes as steps, and is inconsistent with actual intrusion characteristics. A resistivity gradient intrusion formation model is proposed based on improved Logistic function. It realizes continuous inversion of resistivity along radial formation direction using parallel differential evolution algorithm. The algorithm was verified by a three-layer forward model. Whether it is a high-invasion model or a low-invasion model, the resistivity inverted is close to true formation resistivity-the error is less than 1%.

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵延文, 聂在平. 双侧向电阻率测井反演算法研究 [J]. 地球物理学报, 1998, 41(3): 420-431. [2] MICHAEL A F. Accurate real-time resistivity interpretation in vertical and deviated wells [J]. 2007, SPE107266. [3] 刘振华, 张霞. 阵列侧向测井响应的多参数反演 [J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 20(1): 30-33. [4] TAIRA K. Introduction to diffusive logistic equations dynamics [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 2002, 9(2): 289-347. [5] 纪利群. 采用改进Logistic模型预测中国石油消费量 [J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 34(6): 19-22. [6] 张庚骥, 汪涵明. 普通电阻率测井的数值模式匹配解法 [J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1966, 20(2): 23-29. [7] 张庚骥. 电测井算法 [M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2009. [8] 顿月琴, 唐章宏, 冯琳伟. 侧向测井响应计算中模拟柱状电极的快速处理方法 [J]. 测井技术, 2008, 32(4): 310-322. [9] 李庆扬. 数值分析 [M].北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001. [10] 李智强, 范宜仁, 邓少贵, 等. 基于改进差分进化算法的阵列侧向测井反演 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2010, 40(5): 1119-1204. [11] 韩伟, 李道伦, 卢德唐, 等. 利用改进差分进化算法的油田地层参数反演 [J]. 电子技术, 2008(8): 74-78. [12] BERSINI H, DORIGO M, GAMBARELLA L, et al. Result of the first international contest on evolutionary optimization(1st ICEO)[C]∥IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Comutation, 1996: 611-615.

相似文献/References:

[1]邓少贵,徐悦伟,蒋建亮,等.倾斜井非均匀地层的阵列侧向测井响应研究[J].测井技术,2010,34(02):130.
 DENG Shaogui,XU Yuewei,JIANG Jianliang.Study on the Array Laterolog Response of Heterogeneous Formation in Deviated Well[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2010,34(03):130.
[2]李智强,邓少贵,范宜仁,等.裂缝性储层阵列侧向测井响应反演研究[J].测井技术,2010,34(02):138.
 LI Zhiqiang,DENG Shaogui,FAN Yiren,et al.On Inversion of Array Laterolog Responses in Fractured Reservoir[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2010,34(03):138.
[3]冯琳伟,汪德刚,贺飞,等.薄互层和倾斜地层阵列侧向测井响应计算分析[J].测井技术,2013,37(01):80.
 FENG Linwei,WANG Degang,HE Fei,et al.On Response Characteristics Analysis of HAL Tool in Thin Interbeds and Deviated Hole Formation[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2013,37(03):80.
[4]肖东,毛保华,马欢波,等.EALT阵列侧向电阻率测井井场处理软件算法研究及应用[J].测井技术,2016,40(04):432.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2016.04.009]
 XIAO Dong,MAO Baohua,MA Huanbo,et al.EALT Array Lateral Logging Well Site Processing Software Algorithm[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2016,40(03):432.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2016.04.009]
[5]程文娟,许月晨,贺飞,等.径向渐变地层阵列侧向电阻率测井响应研究[J].测井技术,2018,42(03):272.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.03.005]
 CHENG Wenjuan,XU Yuechen,HE Fei,et al.Study on Resistivity Logging Response of Array Lateral Logging under Radial Gradual Formation[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2018,42(03):272.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.03.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目: “十三五”国家科技重大专项多维高精度成像测井系列(2017ZX05019-001); 中国石油集团公司重大科技专项(2017B-3705) 第一作者: 姜黎明,男,1983年生,高级工程师,从事电法测井、岩石物理数值模拟研究。E-mail:zycjjianglm@cnpc.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-30