[1]冯永仁,左有祥,王健,等.地层测试技术及其应用的进展与挑战[J].测井技术,2019,43(03):217-227.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.001]
 FENG Yongren,ZUO Youxiang,WANG Jian,et al.Advances and Challenges in Formation Test and Practical Application[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2019,43(03):217-227.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.001]
点击复制

地层测试技术及其应用的进展与挑战()
分享到:

《测井技术》[ISSN:1004-1338/CN:61-1223/TE]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
217-227
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2019-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Advances and Challenges in Formation Test and Practical Application
文章编号:
1004-1338(2019)03-0217-11
作者:
冯永仁1 左有祥1 王健2 周明高1 秦小飞1 欧阳帅玉3 李东3 沈阳1 孔笋1
(1.中海油田服务股份有限公司油田技术事业部, 燕郊 河北 065201; 2.中海石油(中国)有限公司 天津分公司, 天津 300459; 3.中海油田服务股份有限公司天津分公司, 天津 300459)
Author(s):
FENG Yongren1 ZUO Youxiang1 WANG Jian2 ZHOU Minggao1 QIN Xiaofei1 OUYANG Shuaiyu3 LI Dong3 SHEN Yang1 KONG Sun1
(1. Well Tech Department, China Oilfield Services Limited, Yanjiao, Hebei 065201, China; 2. CNOOC LTD., Tianjin 300459, China; 3. Tianjin Branch, China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin 300459, China)
关键词:
电缆地层测试 随钻地层测试 压力测试 区间压力瞬变测试 井下流体分析 取样 微型压裂
Keywords:
wireline formation test formation test while drilling pressure test interval pressure transient test downhole fluid analysis sampling micro-fracturing
分类号:
P631.84
DOI:
10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2019.03.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
回顾从1955年第一代电缆地层测试器首次商业化应用以来,地层测试技术的发展历程。介绍了自2012年以来,地层测试技术在配套设备、解释方法和实际应用等方面取得的进展,主要包括地层压力测试、区间压力瞬变测试、井下流体分析与取样、微型压裂测试等4个方面。综述了地层测试技术的现状、进展和挑战。指出了该技术的发展趋势和近期的攻关方向。
Abstract:
The development of formation test, downhole fluid analysis and sampling technologies are reviewed since the first generation of wireline formation tester was commercialized in 1955. The advances of formation test technology in supporting equipment, data interpretation and field application are introduced since 2012, involving formation pressure test, transient interval pressure test, downhole fluid analysis and sampling, and micro-fracturing test. The status, advances and challenges of formation test, downhole fluid analysis and sampling technologies are analyzed. And finally, the future development and research of formation test technology are proposed.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨兴琴, 王书南, 周子皓. 地层测试与井下流体取样分析技术进展 [J]. 测井技术, 2012, 36(6): 551-558. [2] AHMED K, HASSAN F, TAQI F, et al. Real-time downhole fluid analysis and sampling with a new optical composition analysis sensor: a case study from Kuwait heavy oil formation [R]. SPE-184112-MS, HOCE, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 6-8 December 2016. [3] 周明高, 刘书民, 冯永仁, 等. 钻井中途油气层测试仪(FCT)研究进展及其应用 [J]. 测井技术, 2008, 32(1): 72-75. [4] 王水航, 陈宝, 杜瑞芳, 等. FDT地层测试器双探针模块研究 [J]. 测井技术, 2011, 35(增刊): 717-721. [5] Improved understanding of reservoir potential through fluid composition [N]. Hart Energy Official 2017 OTC Newspaper, 2017. [6] POP J J, LAASTAD H, ERIKSEN K O, et al. Operational aspects of formation pressure measurements while drilling [C]∥ SPE/IADC 92494, 2004. [7] BANERJEE R, THAMBYNAYAGAM R K M, SPATH J. A method for analysis of pressure response with a formation tester influenced by supercharging [C]∥SPE 102413 presented at Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Moscow, 3-6 October 2006. [8] ZAHER A, SIRJU C. Quantifying the effects of rock and fluid properties on point probe formation pressure measurements [C]∥SPWLA 55th Annual Logging Symposium Abu Dhabi, UAE May 18-22, 2014. [9] CHANG Y C, HAMMOND P S, POP J J. When should we worry about supercharging in formation pressure while drilling measurements? [R]. SPE 92380, published SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering Feb, 2008. [10] POP J J, BADRY R A, MORRIS C W, et al. Vertical interference testing with a wireline conveyed straddle-packer tool [R]. SPE 26481 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October 1993. [11] KUCHUK F J, RAMAKRISHNAN T S, AYAN C, et al. Multilayer reservoir testing with multiprobe wireline formation tester [R]. SPE 36176 presented at the SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 13-16 October 1996. [12] GOODE P A, THAMBYNAYAGAM R K M. Permeability determination with a multiprobe formation tester [R]. 1992SPEFE, 7(4): 297-303. SPE-20737-PA. [13] AYAN C, EL-HAMAWI M, HAFEZ H H, et al. Integration of NMR, wireline tester, core and open hole log data for dynamic reservoir properties [R]. SPE 53273 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show and Conference, Bahrain, 20-23 February 1999. [14] JACKSON R R, BANERJEE R, THAMBYNAYAGAM R KM. An integrated approach to interval pressure transient test analysis using analytical and numerical methods [C]∥ SPE 81515 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 9-12 June 2003. [15] ONUR M, HEGEMAN P S, AND KUCHUK F J. Pressure-pressure convolution analysis of multiprobe and packer-probe wireline formation tester data [R]. SPE 77343 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-2 October 2002. [16] STEFANO CANTINI, DAVIDE BALDINI, ENZO BERETTA, et al. Reservoir permeability from wireline formation testers [R]. SPE 164924, presentation at the EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC held in London, United Kingdom, 10-13 June 2013. [17] PIMONOV E, AYAN C, ONUR M, KUCHUK F. A new pressure/rate deconvolution algorithm to analyze wireline formation tester and well-test data [R]. SPE 123982, 2009. [18] RAMASWAMI S, ELSHAHAWI H, EL BATTAWY. A integration of wireline formation testing and well testing evaluation: an example from the Caspian [R]. SPE 139837, 2012. [19] DONG C, CHU W C, MAJKUT M, et al. Reservoir architecture characterization from integration of fluid property distributions with other logs [C]∥ SPE 124365, presented at the 2009 SPE Offshore Europe Oil & Gas Conference & Exhibition Held in Aberdeen, UK, 8-11 September 2009. [20] JONES C, DAI B, CHEN D, et al. Measurement and use of formation fluid, saturate and aromatic content, with wireline formation testers [C]∥SPWLA 56th Annual Logging Symposium, Long Beach, CA, 18-22 July 2015. [21] RAGHURAMAN B, ABDOU M, CARNEGIE A, et al. Finding Values in formation water [J]. Oilfield Review, Spring, 2011, 23(1): 24-35. [22] ZUO J Y, INDO K, POP J, et al. A New fluid property insitu formation volume factors from formation testing [C]∥SPWLA 57th Annual Logging Symposium Reykjavik, Iceland June 25-29, 2016. [23] CHEN L, GISOLF A, BARBOSA B E, et al. A new approach to obtain in-situ live fluid compressibility in formation testing [C]∥SPWLA Conference Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 2014. [24] MULLINS O C. The physics of reservoir fluids: discovery through downhole fluid analysis [R]. Schlumberger: Sugar Land, Texas 2008. [25] HSU K, HEGEMAN P, DONG C, et al. Multichannel oil-based mud contamination monitoring using downhole optical spectrometer [C]∥SPWLA 49th Annual Logging Symposium Edinburgh, Scotland, 25-28 May 2008. [26] ZUO J Y, MULLINS O C, FREED D, et al. Advances in the Flory-Huggins-Zuo equation of state for asphaltene gradients and formation evaluation [J]. Energy & Fuels 27, 1722-1735. 2013. [27] ZUO J Y, GISOLF A, DUMONT H, et al. A breakthrough in accurate downhole fluid sample contamination prediction in real time [J]. Petrophysics, 2015, 56(3): 251-265. [28] ZUO J Y, GISOLF A, WANG K, et al. Quantitative mixing rules for downhole oil-based mud contamination monitoring in real time using multiple sensors [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016(137): 214-226. [29] GISOLF A, ZUO J Y, ACHOUROV V V, et al. Accurate new solutions for fluid sample contamination quantification, with special focus on water sampling in water based mud [C]∥OTC paper 27291 presented at 2016 Offshore Technology Conference 2016. [30] GODEFROY S, ZUO J, O'KEEFE M, et al. Discussion on the various downhole and surface fluid density measurements and their applications [C]∥SPE-114648SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 21-24 SEP, 2008. [31] DONG C, ELSHAHAWI H, MULLINS O C, et al. Improved interpretation of reservoir architecture and fluid contacts through the integration of downhole fluid analysis with geochemical and mud gas analyses [R]. SPE 109683, Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference & Exhibition(APOGCE), Jakarta, Indonesia 30 October1 November 2007. [32] MISHRA V, BARBOSA B, LECOMPTE, B, et al. Downhole viscosity measurement: revealing reservoir fluid complexities and architecture [C]∥SPWLA Annual Meeting, Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 19-22, 2014. [33] LIU Y, DIFOGGIO R, HUNNUR A, et al. Validation of downhole fluid density, viscosity and sound speed sensor measurements [C]∥SPWLA 54th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, LA, June 22-26, 2013. [34] ROEGIERS J C. Rock mechanics: reservoir stimulation Chapter 3 [M]. Schlumberger Educational Services, Edited by Economides M. J. Nolte K. G., 2000. [35] DESROCHES J, KURKJIAN A L. Applications of wireline stress measurements [R]. 1999SPEREE 2(5): 451-461. SPE-58086-PA. [36] DESROCHES J, MARSDEN J R, COLLEY N M. Wireline open-hole stress tests in a tight gas sandstone [C]∥The International Gas Research Conference, Cannes, France, 6-9 November 1995. [37] THIERCELIN M J, DESROCHES J, AND KURKJIAN A L. Open hole stress tests in shales [R]. SPE 28144 presented at the SPE/ISRM Conference on Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, 29-31 August 1994. [38] CARNEGIE A, THOMAS M, EFNIK M S, et al. An advanced method of determining insitu reservoir stresses: wireline conveyed micro-fracturing [R]. SPE 78486, presented at 10th ADIPEC Conference in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2000. [39] KOKSAL CIG, ALYAQDHAN SULAIMAN AL, MANDHARI, SALEM MOHAMMED EL MSALLATI, et al. Advances in wireline conveyed in-situ reservoir stress testing measurements: case studies from the sultanate of Oman [R]. IPTC 13390, presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference Held in Doha, Qatar, 7-9 December 2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]邸德家,陶果,孙华峰,等.随钻地层测试技术的分析与思考[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):294.
 DI Dejia,TAO Guo,SUN Huafeng,et al.Analysis and Consideration of Formation Testing While Drilling Technology[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(03):294.
[2]高宝善.职业测井分析家协会测井年会征文启事[J].测井技术,1993,17(04):301.
[3]袁庆波.电缆式地层测试技术在丘陵油田水淹层评价中的应用[J].测井技术,2004,28(04):352.
 YUAN Qing-bo.Application of Wireline Formation Tester(WFT) Technology to Evaluating Water-flooded Reservoir in Qiuling Oilfield[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2004,28(03):352.
[4]马建国.电缆式地层测试器[J].测井技术,1984,08(04):70.
[5]运华云,于敦源,谢云,等.电缆地层测试技术在胜利滩海油气勘探中的应用[J].测井技术,2009,33(01):67.
 YUN Hua-yun,YU Dun-yuan,XIE Yun.Application of MDT to Oil-gas Exploration in Shallow Sea Shengli Oilfield[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2009,33(03):67.
[6]赵立新,廖新维.电缆地层测试油气层产能预测技术研究及应用[J].测井技术,2009,33(03):284.
 ZHAO Li-xin,LIAO Xin-wei.An Approach for Reservoir Yield Prediction Using WFT and Its Applications[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2009,33(03):284.
[7]孙华峰,陶果,周艳敏,等.电缆地层测试技术的发展及其在地层和油藏评价中的角色演变[J].测井技术,2010,34(04):314.
 SUN Huafeng,TAO Guo,ZHOU Yanmin,et al.The Evolutive Roles of WFT in Formation and Reservoir Evaluations[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2010,34(03):314.
[8]张国栋,陈忠云,张志强.低渗透率储层流度计算改进方法探讨[J].测井技术,2016,40(01):40.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2016.01.007]
 ZHANG Guodong,CHEN Zhongyun,ZHANG Zhiqiang.Mobility Calculation and Correction Methods of Formation Tester in Low-permeability Sands[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2016,40(03):40.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2016.01.007]
[9]钱赓,穆鹏飞,杨海风,等.渤海海域常压油藏实测地层压力与流体性质关系[J].测井技术,2018,42(04):377.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.04.002]
 QIAN Geng,MU Pengfei,YANG Haifeng,et al.Relationship Between Measured Formation Pressure and Fluid Properties in Normal-pressure Reservoirs in the Bohai Sea[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2018,42(03):377.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.04.002]
[10]杨兴琴,王书南,周子皓.地层测试与井下流体取样分析技术进展[J].测井技术,2012,36(06):551.
 YANG Xingqin,WANG Shunan,ZHOU Zihao.Progresses in Formation Testing and Subsurface Fluid Sampling & Analysis Technology[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(03):551.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目: “十三五”国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发超低渗地层测试技术与装备”(2017ZX05019-004) 作者简介: 冯永仁,男,教授级高级工程师,从事地层测试器的设计和研发工作。E-mail:fengyr@cosl.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-30