[1]范宜仁,王小龙,巫振观,等.考虑地层伤害影响的钻井液侵入模拟研究[J].测井技术,2018,42(04):383-389.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.04.003]
 FAN Yiren,WANG Xiaolong,WU Zhenguan,et al.Simulation Study on Drilling Fluid Invasion Considering Formation Damage[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2018,42(04):383-389.[doi:10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.04.003]
点击复制

考虑地层伤害影响的钻井液侵入模拟研究()
分享到:

《测井技术》[ISSN:1004-1338/CN:61-1223/TE]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
383-389
栏目:
方法研究
出版日期:
2018-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Simulation Study on Drilling Fluid Invasion Considering Formation Damage
文章编号:
1004-1338(2018)04-0383-07
作者:
范宜仁123 王小龙123 巫振观123 吴俊晨123 贾建涛4
1.中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 山东 青岛 266580; 2.海洋国家实验室海洋矿产资源评价与 探测技术功能实验室, 山东 青岛 266071; 3.中国石油大学CNPC测井重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266580; 4.中国石油技术开发有限公司, 北京 100025
Author(s):
FAN Yiren123 WANG Xiaolong123 WU Zhenguan123 WU Junchen123 JIA Jiantao4
1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Huadong), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 2. Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China; 3. CNPC Key Laboratory of Well Logging, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 4. China Petroleum Technology & Development Corporation, Beijing 100025, China
关键词:
测井评价 钻井液侵入 地层伤害 泥饼动态生长 孔渗模型 数值模拟
Keywords:
Keywords: well logging evaluation drilling fluid invasion formation damage dynamic mud cake growth porosity-permeability model numerical simulation
分类号:
P631.811
DOI:
10.16489/j.issn.1004-1338.2018.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
当前钻井液侵入模拟多集中于泥饼性质而忽略钻井液固相颗粒及其滤液侵入所造成的地层伤害对侵入规律的影响。为研究考虑地层伤害影响的钻井液侵入规律,基于两相渗流方程,结合泥饼形成机理,建立含泥饼动态生长的钻井液侵入数值模型,充分考虑钻井液固相颗粒及滤液侵入所造成的地层伤害程度,建立近井眼储层孔隙度渗透率模型,实现了考虑地层伤害影响的钻井液侵入数值模拟,模拟结果与实验结果吻合度较高。研究表明,当地层渗透率大于1 mD时,考虑地层伤害影响的侵入深度与不考虑地层伤害影响的侵入深度一致; 而当地层渗透率小于1 mD时,考虑地层伤害影响的侵入深度比不考虑地层伤害影响的侵入深度更浅,且侵入时间越长,侵入深度差异越大。
Abstract:
Abstract: Drilling fluid invasion would change radial formation saturation and resistivity, which brings difficulties to well logging evaluation. Limited by experimental conditions, the current drilling fluid invasion simulation focuses on the effect of mud cake property and ignores the influence of formation damage on fluid invasioncaused by the solid phase particles and invasion of filtrate of drilling fluid. In order to study the invasion of drilling fluid under the influence of formation damage, based on the two-phase seepage equation and the mud cake formation mechanism, a numerical model of drilling fluid invasion with dynamic growth of mud cake was established.By fully considered the effect of invasion of solid phase particles and filtrate of drilling fluid onthe formation damage, the near-wellbore porosity and permeability model was established. The numerical simulation of drilling fluid invasion considering the influence of formation damage was realized, and the simulation results were in good agreement with the experimental results. Studies results showed that when the permeability is greater than 1 mD, the depth of invasion shows no difference taking into account of the formation damage influence. When the permeability is less than 1 mD, the depth of invasion is shallower when considering the influence of formation damage. Furthermore, the longer the invasion time, the greater the difference in invasion depth.

参考文献/References:

[1] JIAO D, SHARMA M. An experimental investigation of the resistivity profile in the flushed zone [J]. Journal of Nanchang University, 1991(1): 59-63. [2] DEWAN J T, CHENEVERT M E. A model for filtration of water-based mud during drilling: determining of mud cake parameters [J]. Petrophysics, 2014, 2(3): 237-250. [3] 陈福煊, 孙佳戌. 泥浆滤液侵入孔隙地层径向导电特性的模拟实验 [J]. 地球物理学报, 1996, 39(增刊): 371-378. [4] FERGUSON C K, KLOTZ J A. Filtration from mud during drilling [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1954: 30-43. [5] VAUSSARD A, MARTIN M, KONIRSCH O, et al. An experimental study of drilling fluids dynamic filtration [R]. SPE 15412, 1986. [6] 张建华, 胡启. 泥浆侵入条件下时间推移感应测井研究 [J]. 测井技术, 1993, 17(4): 239-251. [7] 常文会, 潘和平, 周峰. 泥浆侵入二维数值模 [J]. 地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 2010, 35(4): 674-680. [8] 邓少贵, 李智强, 范宜仁, 等. 斜井泥浆侵入仿真及其阵列侧向测井响应数值模拟 [J]. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53(4): 994-1000. [9] 杨震, 邓少贵, 范宜仁, 等. 非正交坐标系统下斜井泥浆侵人数值模拟 [J]. 西南石油大学学报, 2007, 29(6): 97-100. [10] SALAZAR J M, TORRES-VERDIN C. Quantitative comparison of processes of oil-and water-based mud-filtrate invasion and corresponding effects on borehole resistivity measurements [J]. Geophysics, 2009, 74(1): E57-E73. [11] WU J H, TORRES-VERDIN C, SEPEHRNOORI K, et al. The influence of water-based mud properties and petrophysical parameters on mudcake growth, filtrate invasion, and formation pressure [J]. Petrophysics, 2005, 46(1): 14-32. [12] 范宜仁, 吴俊晨, 吴飞, 等. 地层模块尺度下的新型钻井液侵入物理模拟系统 [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 125-129. [13] 范宜仁, 巫振观, 吴飞, 等. 地层模块尺度钻井液侵入模拟与储集层电阻率剖面特征 [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(6): 1-9. [14] AZIZ K, SETTARI A. Petroleum reservoir simulation [M]. London: Applied Science Publishers, 1979. [15] NAVARRo D. Effects of invasion transient on resistivity time-lapsed logging [D]. Houston: Houston University, 2007. [16] ARCHIE G E. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics [C]∥ Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineering, 1942, 146(1): 54-62. [17] ECONOMIDES, et al. Petroleum production systems [M]. Englewood: Prentice Hall, 1994.

相似文献/References:

[1]万金彬,李庆华,白松涛.页岩气储层测井评价及进展[J].测井技术,2012,36(05):441.
 WAN Jinbin,LI Qinghua,BAI Songtao.Welllogging Evaluation in Shale Gas Reservoir and Its Advances[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):441.
[2]张凤生,司马立强,赵冉,等.塔河油田储层裂缝测井识别和有效性评价[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):261.
 ZHANG Fengsheng,SIMA Liqiang,ZHAO Ran,et al.Log Identification and Effectiveness Evaluation on Reservoir Fractures in Tahe Oilfield[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):261.
[3]冯春珍,林伟川,成志刚,等.低渗透储层测井分类和产能预测技术[J].测井技术,2012,36(03):308.
 FENG Chunzhen,LIN Weichuan,CHENG Zhigang,et al.Reservoir Classification and Productivity Forecasting Method for Low Prorosity and Permeability Reservoir with Log Data[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):308.
[4]葛祥,何传亮,朱小红,等.川东北地区陆相地层井壁稳定性测井分析[J].测井技术,2012,36(02):164.
 GE Xiang,HE Chuanliang,ZHU Xiaohong,et al.Borehole Stability Logging Analysis in Terrestrial Formation in Northeastern Sichuan[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):164.
[5]胡瑞波,常静春,张文胜,等.歧口凹陷湖相碳酸盐岩储层岩性识别及储集类型研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(02):179.
 HU Ruibo,CHANG Jingchun,ZHAN Wensheng,et al.On Lithology Identification of Limnetic Facies Carbonate Reservoir in Qikou Sag and Its Reservoir Types[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):179.
[6]章海宁,张翔,李国瑛,等.三塘湖盆地火山岩储层测井定量评价方法[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):24.
 ZHANG Haining,ZHANG Xiang,LI Guoying,et al.Quantitative Log Evaluation Method for Volcanic Reservoir in Santanghu Basin[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):24.
[7]肖承文.塔里木盆地高压气藏出砂测井评价方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):41.
 XIAO Chengwen.On Sand Production Log Evaluation of Highpressure Gas Reservoir in Tarim Basin[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):41.
[8]张丽华,潘保芝,庄华,等.低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能测井预测方法研究[J].测井技术,2012,36(01):101.
 ZHANG Lihua,PAN Baozhi,ZHUANG Hua,et al.Productivity Log Forecasting Method for Postfrac Reservoir with Low Porosity and Low Permeability[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):101.
[9]赵江青,匡立春,刘应,等.非均质储层孔喉结构的测井评价方法[J].测井技术,1998,22(S1):60.
[10]李虎,范宜仁,丛云海,等.基于改进SADE算法的神经网络预测储层物性[J].测井技术,2012,36(06):585.
 LI Hu,FAN Yiren,CONG Yunhai,et al.A New Method Predicting Reservoir Properties with Neural Network Based on SADE Algorithm[J].WELL LOGGING TECHNOLOGY,2012,36(04):585.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05020-008); 国家自然科学基金项目(41474100、41674131、41574118); 中国石油天然气集团公司科学研究与技术开发项目(2011D-4101) 第一作者: 范宜仁,男,1962年生,教授,从事岩石物理实验与测井方法等教学与研究工作。E-mail:fanyiren@upc.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-05